Rationale

Professional Practice Two, has overall been difficult and yet easy.
During the project I felt no real purpose, I merely stood as a news reporter to my won blog, reporting back after any major changes.
This was partly due to the fact that before ‘The hang’ there was a minimal amount of jobs to be done pre exhibition, and people that took a greater interest leaped at the opportunity to take the lead roles, thus leaving others with little to do. Most of the work is yet to come, and the ‘proof is in the pudding’ as the saying goes, all else that comes before is merely what we anticipate to work, and to occur similarly this is the same with logistics but not Marketing nor Fundraising.
I felt the team worked together as a whole, there were no bad relationships, all ideas were listened to and tasks that were found were dealt with well and almost always successfully. Where tasks were less successful such as the catalogue, we found alternative routes that worked out well in the end.

I did however find that certain other areas of curating were less satisfactory, not necessarily, the work -load in Fundraising seemed unfair, and it appeared to be the case that certain characters put more effort in than others, but unlike the curators this was less of a desired choice. Thus because of this we did not have the funds raised that we required for certain things to allow the exhibition to go smoothly, particularly the opening, correspondance came across to other groups asking for work to be done for them practically and in the end money came out of our own pockets due to a few people not pulling their weights on other teams.
Everyone at some point had tasks, why could all of us not make a similar effort where asked? Had I been asked on my own team to do a job, I would have jumped at the chance.
With lack of organization in one area this often had a domino effect in other areas, and I feel this effected the exhibition plans negatively. As well as first of all slowing processes down, it also meant certain areas had to be neglected entirely simply. Had people stuck to schedules tightly perhaps we could have done everything we desired to do.

In terms of space we have had issues too, some confrontation has occurred as despite being asked people did not deliver proposals thus receiving less space, while others changed their spaces without referring to the team leader, adding further stress.
Similarly we had problems with timing in the delivery of posters, and have not been allowed the time to advertise as much as would be desirable.
In terms of themes and how we have chosen to plan the exhibition I believe that we have chosen the best themes and names possible, and this will work in a positive way towards the final
All in all despite a small lack of organization and problems with communication in some areas, it seems the exhibition could come together well, but at this point it is still hard to say, which is why a rationale would have seemed appropriate after opening night. I generally finally feel optimistic at the predicted aesthetic, despite being dubious at first, and in particular the idea of individual spaces under Flusty’s theory has turned out incredibly well.